Motor City (2026): Plenty of Horsepower but sputters to cross the finish line.
In 1970s Detroit, John Miller falls for a local gangster's girl. In retaliation, the gangster enacts a frame job to send the innocent man to prison. Life ruined, Miller plots a revenge campaign against the man who took his girl away.
There is something almost heroic about making an action movie with reportedly five lines of dialogue in an age when most films feel obligated to explain the plot, explain the explanation, and then have somebody explain how the explanation made them feel. Motor City takes the opposite route. It puts Alan Ritchson in 1970s Detroit, gives him the emotional range of a wounded lion and the shoulder width of a municipal snowplow, then lets the music, faces and flying furniture do the talking.
Ritchson plays John Miller, a working-class romantic who falls for Sophia, played by Shailene Woodley. Unfortunately, Sophia is connected to Reynolds, a gangster played by Ben Foster, and Reynolds reacts to romantic competition with all the grace of a raccoon trapped in a kitchen cupboard. Miller is framed, sent to prison and stripped of the life he was trying to build. When he gets the chance to settle accounts, the film shifts from blue-collar love story to a revenge symphony in the key of blunt-force trauma. That is all the plot you need. Describing the machinery too closely would ruin the pleasure of watching the gears turn.
Director Potsy Ponciroli makes a bold choice by removing almost every conventional storytelling crutch. There is no voiceover, helpful newscaster or seven-minute backstory monologue beginning with, “You see, John, when we were children.” The film simply expects us to look at the screen. Imagine that. Cinema asking us to use our eyes. Somewhere, a streaming executive just broke out in hives.
For the most part, the gamble works. Because the actors cannot lean on dialogue, every glance, tightened jaw and uncomfortable pause matters. Ritchson is well suited to this. He has the physical presence of a refrigerator that has developed trust issues, but he can also communicate hurt without turning the movie into an acting workshop. Miller’s silence does not feel empty. It feels pressurized.
Ben Foster understands the assignment too. He has always been good at suggesting that something behind his eyes is chewing through the restraints. Reynolds does not need a speech about power because Foster carries himself like a man who thinks everyone else is furniture. Woodley bridges the emotional territory between them largely through expression and movement.
Still, I never completely bought how easily Sophia slips back into Reynolds’s orbit. The relationship moves with the kind of convenience normally reserved for finding a parking spot directly in front of Costco on a Saturday. I understood what the movie needed her to do, but I did not believe a real person would do it that quickly. Without dialogue, behaviour must be even more convincing, and here the silence exposes a weak joint.
The soundtrack, on the other hand, becomes a narrator, emotional translator and occasional getaway driver. The music tells us when hope is sneaking into the room, when danger has arrived and when vengeance is warming up in the bullpen. The songs and Steve Jablonsky’s score give the film a pulse that spoken exposition might have smothered. You feel the soundtrack pushing scenes forward with both hands.
Then there is the slow motion. Good grief, there is a lot of it, and I mean that mostly as a compliment. Ponciroli stages action like he is photographing a particularly violent rock album cover. Bodies twist, glass floats and punches land with enough ceremony to qualify for government funding. Some will call it overdone. I enjoyed the swagger. In a nearly wordless revenge opera, subtlety has already left with the sensible shoes.
The best action sequences are clear and physical rather than chopped into frantic confetti. I could tell who was hitting whom and where everyone was standing. That should not feel revolutionary, but modern action movies have lowered the bar until basic geographic coherence deserves a parade. Ritchson gets to loom, absorb punishment and return it with interest.
Visually, the film commits to its grimy 1970s setting without making every frame look like it was dipped in pumpkin-spice motor oil. The cars, clothes, factories and nightclubs create a Detroit that feels bruised but alive. Unfortunately, one period detail deserves prosecution. Alan Ritchson’s early wig is terrible. It looks less like hair and more like a small woodland creature was placed on his head and promised union scale. I spent several scenes waiting for it to blink. Thankfully, the movie eventually moves past this follicular hate crime.
I was also less impressed by the unnecessary nudity. It does not deepen the characters, sharpen the danger or meaningfully advance the story. It feels included because someone remembered this was an R-rated crime picture and started checking boxes. In a film this visually deliberate, every image should earn its place. These moments do not, and they briefly cheapen a movie that is otherwise trying to communicate with precision.
The ending is the other major stumble. Without revealing what happens, it feels tacked on, as if the film reaches its natural stopping point and remembers an unused page in the printer. I would have made a different choice. The conclusion should carry the accumulated weight of Miller’s journey. Instead, somebody seems to change the destination after the car is already in the driveway.
Even with those problems, I admire Motor City for taking a genuine swing. It trusts images, music, sound and performance while many films fear viewers might glance at their phones and miss a plot point. The familiar revenge story strains under all that style, but the film has an identity. It looks and sounds like somebody made choices, putting it ahead of the beige content sliding out of Hollywood’s industrial air fryer.
Motor City is muscular, stylish and refreshingly willing to shut up. Its minimal dialogue focuses attention on facial nuance and physical storytelling, the soundtrack carries enormous dramatic weight, and the slow-motion action delivers exactly the operatic crunch it promises. The unbelievable relationship turn, needless nudity, unfortunate opening wig and cheap-feeling ending keep it from shifting into a higher gear. Still, as a bold, bruising experiment in visual action filmmaking, it earns a respectable 6.8/10.
#MotorCity #MotorCityMovie #AlanRitchson #ShaileneWoodley #BenFoster #MovieReview #ActionMovies #RevengeThriller #WhatIsDanWatching
Comments