top of page
Search

Nocturne (2026) Series: Murder, Madness, and Another Detective Who Needs Therapy

2 minutes ago
6 min read

When a victim of serial killer Jurek Walter turns up alive, detective Jonah Lynn races to find the one person still missing, while his protégé Saga Bauer goes undercover for answers from the killer himself. Based on the bestselling novel by Lars Kepler.


There are two things Hollywood apparently can't live without: serial killers with an unhealthy interest in psychological warfare and detectives whose personal lives resemble the aftermath of a drunken demolition derby. Throw in a female FBI agent with enough attitude to power a small nuclear reactor, and you've got Nocturne, Apple TV's latest excursion into the darker corners of the human psyche.


And wouldn't you know it? Despite a few familiar television clichés that should have been buried in an unmarked grave sometime around 2015, this thing actually works.


Well, mostly.


Based on the bestselling crime novels of Lars Kepler, Nocturne stars Liev Schreiber, Zazie Beetz, and Stephen Graham in a psychological thriller that takes its sweet time getting under your skin. It's the television equivalent of somebody slowly dragging a fingernail across a chalkboard while whispering that everything is perfectly fine.


Spoiler alert: Everything is most definitely not fine.


The story follows Jonah Lynn, played by Schreiber, a former soldier turned homicide detective who figured escaping Philadelphia for the quieter surroundings of western Pennsylvania might provide a little peace and tranquility.


That's adorable.


Apparently, nobody explained to Jonah that moving to a small town in a television thriller is roughly as effective as hiding from a tornado in a garden shed.


Enter Jurek Walter, a particularly disturbing serial killer played by Stephen Graham. When one of Walter's presumed victims unexpectedly turns up alive, the hunt begins for another missing person, and Jonah finds himself dragged back into a nightmare he'd probably prefer to forget.


Meanwhile, FBI agent Saga Bauer, played by Zazie Beetz, goes undercover to extract answers from Walter himself.


What could possibly go wrong?


Now, I'm a Liev Schreiber fan. Always have been. There's something about the guy that makes him effortlessly cool without appearing to work particularly hard at it. He's got that gravelly voice, the thousand-yard stare, and the natural ability to look like he could either solve a murder or break your kneecaps without changing his facial expression.


He's the kind of actor who could read the ingredients on a box of breakfast cereal and somehow make you believe the cornflakes were involved in organized crime.


Schreiber brings a welcome sense of gravity to Jonah. He's believable, understated, and carries himself like a man who's seen enough ugliness to last several lifetimes.


Unfortunately, that brings me to my first complaint.


Can we please retire the broken detective?


Seriously. At this point, television detectives have accumulated more psychological baggage than an international airport during Christmas.


Every investigator apparently needs a tragic past, emotional scars, unresolved guilt, and a personal life held together with duct tape and prescription medication.


Whatever happened to the competent cop who simply enjoys solving crimes, goes home, grills a steak, and watches the hockey game?


Apparently, that guy isn't complicated enough for modern television.


Don't misunderstand me. Schreiber handles the material beautifully. My frustration isn't with his performance. It's with Hollywood's seemingly religious devotion to the idea that a detective can't be interesting unless his emotional stability resembles a Jenga tower in an earthquake.


And then there's Stephen Graham.


Good grief, this guy can be unsettling.


Graham has developed an impressive talent for portraying characters who make you instinctively check whether you've locked the front door. As Jurek Walter, he brings a quiet, calculating menace that doesn't require theatrical screaming, elaborate speeches, or the sort of villainous overacting that would embarrass a Batman cartoon.


He's frightening because he doesn't need to advertise it.


There's something particularly disturbing about a villain who appears perfectly comfortable with his own darkness. The kind of character who makes a simple conversation feel like you're negotiating with a rattlesnake wearing a business suit.


That's where Nocturne really shines.


The creep factor is absolutely there.


In fact, although Apple categorizes this as a crime thriller, I'd argue there's a healthy dose of horror lurking beneath the surface. Not the cheap variety where somebody jumps out of a closet accompanied by an orchestra having a nervous breakdown.


I'm talking about psychological horror.


The kind that makes ordinary surroundings feel threatening and turns silence into something considerably more uncomfortable than noise.


It's a welcome change from productions that seem convinced audiences require a car explosion every eleven minutes to maintain consciousness.


The atmosphere does a remarkable amount of heavy lifting here. There's a persistent sense that something is wrong, even during moments when very little appears to be happening.


And that's both the show's greatest strength and one of its potential weaknesses.


Because Nocturne is a slow burn.


A very slow burn.


We're talking barbecue brisket at three in the morning slow.


The tension builds gradually, becoming more intense with each episode, and I appreciate the patience involved. Rather than throwing every card onto the table before the opening credits have finished, the writers allow the mystery to develop.


The trouble with this approach is that you're making a fairly substantial promise to the audience.


If you're going to spend hours winding the clock, there had better be one hell of a chime when it finally strikes midnight.


And since the series is still rolling out episodes, that remains an open question.


I'm invested, but I'm also watching the writers with the suspicious expression of a man who's just been told his extended car warranty is about to expire.


Then we have Zazie Beetz as Saga Bauer.


Beetz is a talented actress, and she brings conviction and intelligence to the role. Her character has an important job to do, and the undercover element adds another layer of tension to an already uncomfortable situation.


But there's something about the way her FBI authority is presented that occasionally gets under my skin.


Here we go again with the Hollywood version of female empowerment, where demonstrating strength apparently requires treating the experienced male investigator like he's a particularly dim substitute teacher.


Saga's disdain for the cop who handled the case feels overplayed at times.


I'm all for capable female characters. Give me intelligence, courage, resourcefulness, and the ability to make difficult decisions under pressure. Those qualities make for compelling television regardless of whether the character is wearing a necktie or high heels.


But competence doesn't require contempt.


Sometimes Hollywood seems to confuse a strong woman with someone who needs to establish dominance in every conversation. It's the dramatic equivalent of walking into a room, announcing you're the smartest person there, and then wondering why nobody invites you to the Christmas party.


Beetz deserves better than those moments because she's clearly capable of delivering something considerably more nuanced.


Which brings me to the writing.


The acting across the board is excellent. Schreiber, Graham, and Beetz are all operating at a level that makes the production feel serious and substantial.


But occasionally I find myself wishing the story would give these performers a little more meat to chew on.


You've assembled a cast capable of serving a five-course dramatic feast, yet some scenes feel like they're being handed a plate of crackers and told to improvise dinner.


There's enough intrigue to keep me interested, but I want more character development that goes beyond trauma, suspicion, and professional hostility.


The ingredients are all there. The question is whether the writers can turn them into something truly memorable rather than another respectable entry in television's increasingly crowded serial-killer catalogue.


What keeps me coming back is the atmosphere and the performances.


There's a genuine sense of danger running through this production, and I appreciate a thriller willing to trust its audience with discomfort instead of constantly explaining what we're supposed to feel.


Director Tim Van Patten helped launch the series, and the production has that polished, cinematic quality Apple TV has become increasingly good at delivering.


It looks like somebody actually spent money on the screen instead of blowing the entire budget on executive retreats and artisanal bottled water.


Imagine that.


And while I'm not convinced every character decision works, the central mystery has enough teeth to keep me curious about where this thing is heading.


The biggest challenge facing Nocturne isn't its cast, its atmosphere, or even its leisurely pacing.


It's expectation.


When you spend this much time creating dread, you can't eventually deliver an ending with the dramatic impact of discovering somebody forgot to put the garbage bins out.


The payoff needs to justify the investment.


For now, I'm enjoying the ride, even if I occasionally want to reach through the television and tell everyone to stop brooding long enough to get some actual police work done.


Nocturne is a creepy, atmospheric psychological thriller elevated by excellent performances from Liev Schreiber, Stephen Graham, and Zazie Beetz. The slow-building tension and unmistakable horror undertones make it worth watching, although the familiar broken-detective routine, occasionally heavy-handed character dynamics, and somewhat underfed writing prevent it from reaching greatness. There's enough darkness here to keep me interested, but the jury is still out on whether the eventual payoff will justify the long, unsettling journey. For now, it's a solid recommendation for anyone who enjoys intelligent crime thrillers and doesn't mind waiting for the pot to boil. Just don't expect your nerves to thank you.


My Ranking: 7.4/10.



 
 
 

Comments


Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2020 by What should we watch?. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page