top of page

Frasier: Nostalgia or Nausea? A Reboot Rant

Frasier is off to a different city with new challenges to face, new relationships to forge, and an old dream or two to finally fulfill. Frasier has re-entered the building.

Oh, sweet nostalgia, how you play tricks on our hearts. The reboot of "Frasier" has graced our screens, and it's time for my unfiltered take on this reunion of radio rants and snobby sophistication. Grab your sherry glasses and prepare for a rollercoaster of emotions as we dive into the world of Frasier Crane 2.0.

First off, let's talk about the stars of the show. Kelsey Grammer is back, and I must say, he's like a fine wine — only getting better with age. Grammer's return as the lovably pretentious psychiatrist gives us the familiar comfort of slipping into a pair of well-worn slippers. But, and it's a big but, there are some new kids on the block — Jack Cutmore-Scott and Jess Salgueiro. Now, I'm all for fresh faces, but these two feel like they walked in wearing someone else's shoes. Cutmore-Scott lacks the refined snobbishness we've come to expect from the Crane family, and Salgueiro, well, let's just say she's not exactly hitting the high notes of comedic brilliance.

Now, let's dive into the trailer, shall we? You can watch it here, but be warned, it's like a sneak peek into a parallel universe where Frasier left Seattle for the bright lights of... wherever this new city is. The plot promises new challenges, new relationships, and the resurrection of old dreams. But let's be real, it's like they threw a bunch of darts at a map, and wherever they landed, Frasier decided to set up shop. And yes, Frasier has re-entered the building, but the question is, do we really want him there?

Now, I'm not one to crush dreams (okay, maybe I am), but there are some things to love about this reboot. The same silly humor and heartwarming moments are sprinkled throughout, giving us a taste of the old "Frasier" magic. It's like slipping on a pair of rose-tinted glasses and reminiscing about the good old days when life was simpler, and sitcoms were our escape. Ah, the sweet embrace of nostalgia!

But, and it's a big but (again), let's address the elephant in the room — the new characters. Cutmore-Scott and Salgueiro, I'm sure you're lovely people in real life, but your on-screen personas are about as charming as a wet blanket. It's like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole — awkward, uncomfortable, and downright cringe-worthy. And the jokes, oh dear Frasier, the jokes. Stale is an understatement. It's like they dusted off the old joke book from the '90s and decided to recycle the humor. Come on, we've evolved since then; surely, our sitcoms can too.

Now, for some extra tidbits. The bar is named Mahoney's as a tribute to the late John Mahoney. A lovely gesture, but it's a constant reminder of what we had and what we're missing in this reboot. And David Hyde Pierce, the beloved Niles Crane, declined to reprise his role. Can you blame him? After eleven seasons of neurotic perfection, he probably needed a break. Kelsey Grammer and Peri Gilpin are the only two who saw potential in this reboot disaster and decided to come back for more. Brave souls or gluttons for punishment? You be the judge.

In conclusion, "Frasier" 2.0 is a mixed bag of emotions. The warm embrace of nostalgia is comforting, but the cringe-worthy moments and lackluster new characters leave us yearning for the good ol' days. The stale jokes are like a bad punchline to a mediocre sitcom — expected, but still disappointing. So, where does this leave us? On the edge of our seats, hoping for a miraculous turnaround in the episodes to come. As it stands, "Frasier" gets a ranking of 7.2 out of 10, and that's being generous. Cheers to the past, present, and whatever the heck this reboot is supposed to be.

9 views0 comments


bottom of page